Van Cortlandt card table

September 21, 2012 at 9:03 am 1 comment

This gorgeous hunk of mahogany has been in our “Picturing America” colonial portrait gallery since 2001. But only in 2011 did it become mine the Museum’s.  Another museum in distress was putting it on the auction block, and with the support of my Director and our trustees, we purchased it in a private sale.


Card table in the
English rococo style
Unknown maker,
New York City
Mahogany, 1760-1775
Purchase 2011 The Mr. and Mrs.
William V. Griffin Fund
and Helen McMahon
Brady Cutting Fund 2011.10

So why did I have to have this particular table? Isn’t there enough of this kind of thing across the river(s) in the Metropolitan’s American Wing?  Yes and no.

In 1925, the formidable widow, Sarah Schuyler Van Rensselaer, of Kearny, New Jersey, left us a group of Colonial objects, including this table. In 1931 it was taken away from the Museum by court order because we were not displaying it enough, according to the estate’s executors. It was given to another institution, from whom we borrowed it back for our permanent American art galleries.

In researching this piece again, when it became available for purchase, I realized that the Sarah Van Rensselaer was not the actual heiress of this table; she was the widow of Stephen Van Cortlandt Van Rensselaer of Newark, who died in 1885. He was born in the early nineteenth century in Newark, and the table, made for an ancestor in the 1770s in New York City, had in fact been in Newark since the early 1800s. It is the only known New York Chippendale card table with such a long New Jersey provenance.  To most people, this means nothing; but to a curator it is everything.

It makes my heart leap every time I see it.

-By Ulysses Grant Dietz, Chief Curator


Entry filed under: Uncategorized.

Final Notes From South Africa The Evolution of Abstraction in Tony Smith’s Artwork

1 Comment Add your own

  • 1. Adam Herbst  |  September 21, 2012 at 11:45 am

    I’ve always wondered what is meant by “card table?” My mind’s eye conjures up images from the movie “Famingo Kid” of old guys playing gin side by side with cabanas. Somehow, I think that is not correct. Is it possible that the cards were visiting cards? If they were for game playing, what were the games?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed

Join the Newark Museum blog page!

Join 239 other followers

Follow us on Twitter

Newark Museum Flickr Photos


September 2012
« Aug   Oct »


%d bloggers like this: